A few weeks ago we upgraded a lot of the core infrastructure in our New York (okay, it’s really in New Jersey now – but don’t tell anyone) data center. We love being open with everything we do (including infrastructure), and really consider it one of the best job perks we have. So here’s how and why we upgrade a data center. First, take a moment to look at what Stack Overflow started as. It’s 5 years later and hardware has come a long way.

Why?

Up until 2 months ago, we hadn’t replaced any servers since upgrading from the original Stack Overflow web stack. There just hasn’t been a need since we first moved to the New York data center (Oct 23rd, 2010 – over 4 years ago).  We’re always reorganizing, tuning, checking allocations, and generally optimizing code and infrastructure wherever we can. We mostly do this for page load performance; the lower CPU and memory usage on the web tier is usually a (welcomed) side-effect.

So what happened? We had a meetup. All of the Stack Exchange engineering staff got together at our Denver office in October last year and we made some decisions. One of those decisions was what to do about infrastructure hardware from a lifecycle and financial standpoint. We decided that from here on out: hardware is good for approximately 4 years. After that we will: retire it, replace it, or make an exception and extend the warranty on it. This lets us simplify a great many things from a management perspective, for example: we limit ourselves to 2 generations of servers at any given time and we aren’t in the warranty renewal business except for exceptions. We can order all hardware up front with the simple goal of 4 years of life and with a 4 year warranty.

Why 4 years? It seems pretty arbitrary. Spoiler alert: it is. We were running on 4 year old hardware at the time and it worked out pretty well so far. Seriously, that’s it: do what works for you. Most companies depreciate hardware across 3 years, making questions like “what do we do with the old servers?” much easier. For those unfamiliar, depreciated hardware effectively means “off the books.” We could re-purpose it outside production, donate it, let employees go nuts, etc. If you haven’t heard, we raised a little money recently. While the final amounts weren’t decided when we were at the company meetup in Denver, we did know that we wanted to make 2015 an investment year and beef up hardware for the next 4.

Over the next 2 months, we evaluated what was over 4 years old and what was getting close. It turns out almost all of our Dell 11th generation hardware (including the web tier) fits these criteria – so it made a lot of sense to replace the entire generation and eliminate a slew of management-specific issues with it. Managing just 12th and 13th generation hardware and software makes life a lot easier – and the 12th generation hardware will be mostly software upgradable to near equivalency to 13th gen around April 2015.

What Got Love

In those 2 months, we realized we were running on a lot of old servers (most of them from May 2010):

  • Web Tier (11 servers)
  • Redis Servers (2 servers)
  • Second SQL Cluster (3 servers – 1 in Oregon)
  • File Server
  • Utility Server
  • VM Servers (5 servers)
  • Tag Engine Servers (2 servers)
  • SQL Log Database

We also could use some more space, so let’s add on:

  • An additional SAN
  • An additional DAS for the backup server

That’s a lot of servers getting replaced. How many? This many: Greg Bray, and a lot of old servers.

The Upgrade

I know what you’re thinking: “Nick, how do you go about making such a fancy pile of servers?” I’m glad you asked. Here’s how a Stack Exchange infrastructure upgrade happens in the live data center. We chose not to failover for this upgrade; instead we used multiple points of redundancy in the live data center to upgrade it while all traffic was flowing from there.

Day -3 (Thursday, Jan 22nd): Our upgrade plan was finished (this took about 1.5 days total), including everything we could think of. We had limited time on-site, so to make the best of that we itemized and planned all the upgrades in advance (most of them successfully, read on). You can find a read the full upgrade plan here.

Day 0 (Sunday, Jan 25th): The on-site sysadmins for this upgrade were George Beech, Greg Bray, and Nick Craver (note: several remote sysadmins were heavily involved in this upgrade as well: Geoff Dalgas online from Corvallis, OR, Shane Madden, online from Denver, CO, and Tom Limoncelli who helped a ton with the planning online from New Jersey). Shortly before flying in we got some unsettling news about the weather. We packed our snow gear and headed to New York.

Day 1 (Monday, Jan 26th): While our office is in lower Manhattan, the data center is now located in Jersey City across the Hudson river: Office to the Data Center We knew there was a lot to get done in the time we had allotted in New York, weather or not. The thought was that if we skipped Monday we likely couldn’t get back to the data center Tuesday if the PATH (mass transit to New Jersey) shut down. This did end up happening. The team decision was: go time. We got overnight gear then headed to the data center. Here’s what was there waiting to be installed:

Web, Redis, and Service serversNew 10Gb network gearFX2s Blade Chassis for VMs

Yeah, we were pretty excited too. Before we got started with the server upgrade though, we first had to fix a critical issue with the redis servers supporting the launching-in-24-hours Targeted Job Ads. These machines were originally for Cassandra (we broke that data store), then Elasticsearch (broke that too), and eventually redis. Curious? Jason Punyon and Kevin Montrose have an excellent blog series on Providence, you can find Punyon’s post on what broke with each data store here.

The data drives we ordered for these then-redundant systems were the Samsung 840 Pro drives which turned out to have a critical firmware bug. This was causing our server-to-server copies across dual 10Gb network connections to top out around 12MB/s (ouch). Given the hundreds of gigs of memory in these redis instances, that doesn’t really work. So we needed to upgrade the firmware on these drives to restore performance. This needed to be online, letting the RAID 10 arrays rebuild as we went. Since you can’t really upgrade firmware over most USB interfaces, we tore apart this poor, poor little desktop to do our bidding:

Once that was kicked off, it ran in parallel with other work (since RAID 10s with data take tens of minutes to rebuild, even with SSDs). The end result was much improved 100-200MB/s file copies (we’ll see what new bottleneck we’re hitting soon – still lots of tuning to do). Now the fun begins. In Rack C (we have high respect for our racks, they get title casing), we wanted to move from the existing SFP+ 10Gb connectivity combined with 1Gb uplinks for everything else to a single dual 10Gb BASE-T (RJ45 connector) copper solution. This is for a few reasons: The SFP+ cabling we use is called twinaxial which is harder to work with in cable arms, has unpredictable girth when ordered, and can’t easily be gotten natively in the network daughter cards for these Dell servers. The SFP+ FEXes also don’t allow us to connect any 1Gb BASE-T items that we may have (though that doesn’t apply in this rack, it does when making it a standard across all racks like with our load balancers). So here’s what we started with in Rack C:

What we want to end up with is:

The plan was to simplify network config, cabling, overall variety, and save 4U in the process. Here’s what the top of the rack looked like when we started: …and the middle (cable management covers already off):

Let’s get started. First, we wanted the KVMs online while working so we, ummm, “temporarily relocated” them: Now that those are out of the way, it’s time to drop the existing SFP+ FEXes down as low as we could to install the new 10Gb BASE-T FEXes in their final home up top: The nature of how the Nexus Fabric Extenders work allows us to allocate between 1 and 8 uplinks to each FEX. This means we can unplug 4 ports from each FEX without any network interruption, take the 4 we find dead in the VPC (virtual port channel) out of the VPC and assign them to the new FEX. So we go from 8/0 to 4/4 to 0/8 overall as we move from old to new through the upgrade. Here’s the middle step of that process: With the new network in place, we can start replacing some servers. We yanked several old servers already, one we virtualized and 2 we didn’t need anymore. Combine this with evacuating our NY-VM01 & NY-VM02 hosts and we’ve made 5U of space through the rack. On top of NY-VM01&02 was 1 of the 1Gb FEXes and 1U of cable management. Luckily for us, everything is plugged into both FEXes and we could rip one out early. This means we could spin up the new VM infrastructure faster than we had planned. Yep, we’re already changing THE PLAN™. That’s how it goes. What are we replacing those aging VM servers with? I’m glad you asked. These bad boys:

There are 2 of these Dell PowerEdge FX2s Blade Chassis each with 2 FC630 blades. Each blade has dual Intel E5-2698v3 18-core processors and 768GB of RAM (and that’s only half capacity). Each chassis has 80Gbps of uplink capacity as well via the dual 4x 10Gb IOA modules. Here they are installed:

The split with 2 half-full chassis give us 2 things: capacity to expand by double, and avoiding any single points of failure with the VM hosts. That was easy, right? Well what we didn’t plan on was the network portion of the day, it turns out those IO Aggregators in the back are pretty much full switches with 4 external 10Gbps ports and 8 internal 10Gbps (2 per blade) ports each. Once we figured out what they could and couldn’t do, we got the bonding in place and the new hosts spun up.

It’s important to note here it wasn’t any of the guys in the data center spinning up this VM architecture after the network was live. We’re setup so that Shane Madden was able to do all this remotely. Once he had the new NY-VM01 & 02 online (now blades), we migrated all VMs over to those 2 hosts and were able to rip out the old NY-VM03-05 servers to make more room. As we ripped things out, Shane was able to spin up the last 2 blades and bring our new beasts fully online. The net result of this upgrade was substantially more CPU and memory (from 528GB to 3,072GB overall) as well as network connectivity. The old hosts each had 4x 1Gb (trunk) for most access and 2x 10Gb for iSCSI access to the SAN. The new blade hosts each have 20Gb of trunk access to all networks to split as they need.

But we’re not done yet. Here’s the new EqualLogic PS6210 SAN that went in below (that’s NY-LOGSQL01 further below going in as well):

VM Servers, SAN, and NY-LOGSQL01 Our old SAN was a PS6200 with 24x 900GB 10k drives and SFP+ only. This is a newer 10Gb BASE-T 24x 1.2TB 10k version with more speed, more space, and the ability to go active/active with the existing SAN. Along the the SAN we also installed this new NY-LOGSQL01 server (replacing an aging Dell R510 never designed to be a SQL server – it was purchased as a NAS):

The additional space freed by the other VM hosts let us install a new file and utility server:

Of note here: the NY-UTIL02 utility server has a lot of drive bays so we could install 8x Samsung 840 Pros in a RAID 0 in order to restore and test the SQL backups we make every night. It’s RAID 0 for space because all of the data is literally loaded from scratch nightly – there’s nothing to lose. An important lesson we learned last year was that the 840 Pros do not have capacitors in there and power loss will cause data loss if they’re active since they have a bit of DIMM for write cache on board. Given this info – we opted to stick some Intel S3700 800GB drives we had from the production SQL server upgrades into our NY-DEVSQL01 box and move the less resilient 840s to this restore server where it really doesn’t matter.

Okay, let’s snap back to blizzard reality. At this point mass transit had shut down and all hotels in (blizzard) walking distance were booked solid. Though we started checking accommodations as soon as we arrived on site, we had no luck finding any hotels. Though the blizzard did far less than predicted, it was still stout enough to shut everything down. So, we decided to go as late as we could and get ahead of schedule. To be clear: this was the decision of the guys on site, not management. At Stack Exchange employees are trusted to get things done, however they best perceive how to do that. It’s something we really love about this job.

If life hands you lemons, ignore those silly lemons and go install shiny new hardware instead.

This is where we have to give a shout out to our data center QTS. These guys had the office manager help us find any hotel we could, set out extra cots for us to crash on, and even ordered extra pizza and drinks so we didn’t go starving. This was all without asking – they are always fantastic and we’d recommend them to anyone looking for hosting in a heartbeat.

After getting all the VMs spun up, the SAN configured, and some additional wiring ripped out, we ended around 9:30am Tuesday morning when mass transit was spinning back up. To wrap up the long night, this was the near-heart attack we ended on, a machine locking up at: BIOS Lockup Turns out a power supply was just too awesome and needed replacing. The BIOS did successfully upgrade with the defective power supply removed and we got a replacement in before the week was done. Note: we ordered a new one rather than RMA the old one (which we did later). We keep a spare power supply for each wattage level in the data center, and try to use as few different levels as possible.

Day 2 (Tuesday, Jan 27th): We got some sleep, got some food, and arrived on site around 8pm. Starting the web tier (a rolling build out) was kicked off first:

A stack of web serversA line of web serversSame line!Inside a web server

While we rotated 3 servers at a time out for rebuilds on the new hardware, we also upgraded some existing R620 servers from 4x 1Gb network daughter cards to 2x 10Gb + 2x 1Gb NDCs. Here’s what that looks like for NY-SERVICE03:

A line of web serversSame line!Inside a web server

The web tier rebuilding gave us a chance to clean up some cabling. Remember those 2 SFP+ FEXes? They’re almost empty: The last 2 items were the old SAN and that aging R510 NAS/SQL server. This is where the first major hiccup in our plan occurred. We planned to install a 3rd PCIe card in the backup server pictured here: We knew it was a Dell R620 10 bay chassis that has 3 half-height PCIe cards. We knew it had a SAS controller for the existing DAS and a PCIe card for the SFP+ 10Gb connections it has (it’s in the network rack with the cores in which all 96 ports are 10Gb SFP+). Oh hey look at that, it’s hooked to a tape drive which required another SAS controller we forgot aboutCrap. Okay, these things happen. New plan.

We had extra 10Gb network daughter cards (NDCs) on hand, so we decided to upgrade the NDC in the backup server, remove the SFP+ PCIe card, and replace it with the new 12Gb SAS controller. We also forgot to bring the half-height mounting bracket for the new card and had to get creative with some metal snips (edit: turns out it never came with one – we feel slightly less dumb about this now). So how do we plug that new 10Gb BASE-T card into the network core? We can’t. At least not at 10Gb. Those 2 last SFP+ items in Rack C also need a home – so we decided to make a trade. The whole backup setup (including  new MD1400 DAS) just love their new Rack C home:

Then we could finally remove those SFP+ FEXes, bring those KVMs back to sanity, and clean things up in Rack C:

Those pesky hanging KVMsTop of Rack CMiddle of Rack C

See? There was a plan all along. The last item to go in Rack C for the day is NY-GIT02, our new Gitlab and TeamCity server:

Signatures from the New York devsRacked and ready to go

Note: we used to run TeamCity on Windows on NY-WEB11. Geoff Dalgas threw out the idea during the upgrade of moving it to hardware: the NY-GIT02 box. Because they are such intertwined dependencies (for which both have an offsite backup), combining them actually made sense. It gave TeamCity more power, even faster disk access (it does a lot of XML file…stuff), and made the web tier more homogenous all at the same time. It also made the downtime of NY-WEB11 (which was imminent) have far less impact. This made lots of sense, so we changed THE PLAN™ and went with it. More specifically, Dalgas went with it and set it all up, remotely from Oregon. While this is happening, Greg was fighting with a DSC install hang regarding git on our web tier: Greg losing to DSC Wow that’s a lot of red, I wonder who’s winning. And that’s Dalgas in a hangout on my laptop, hi Dalgas! Since the web tier builds were a relatively new process fighting us, we took the time to address some of the recent cabling changes. The KVMs were installed hastily not long before this because we knew a re-cable was coming. In Rack A for example we moved the top 10Gb FEX up a U to expand the cable management to 2U and added 1U of management space between the KVMs. Here’s that process:

A messy starting KVMRemoving the cable management to make roomAhhhh room!That's better, all done.

Since we had to re-cable from the 1Gb middle FEXes in Rack A & B (all 4 being removed) to the 10Gb Top-of-Rack FEXes, we moved a few things around. The CloudFlare load balancers down below the web tier at the bottom moved up to spots freed by the recently virtualized DNS servers to join the other 2 public load balancers. The removal of the 1Gb FEXes as part of our all-10Gb overhaul meant that the middle of Racks A & B had much more space available, here’s the before and after:

Web tier below a 1Gb FEXLook at all that space!

After 2 batches of web servers, cable cleanup, and network gear removal, we called it quits around 8:30am to go grab some rest. Things were moving well and we only had half the web tier, cabling, and a few other servers left to replace.

Day 3 (Wednesday, Jan 28th): We were back in the data center just before 5pm, set up and ready to go. The last non-web servers to be replaced were the redis and “service” (tag engine, elasticsearch indexing, etc.) boxes:

A look inside redisNY-REDIS01 and NY-SERVICE05 racked and ready for an OS

We have 3 tag engine boxes (purely for reload stalls and optimal concurrency, not load) and 2 redis servers in the New York data center. One of the tag engine boxes was a more-recent R620, (this one got the 10Gb upgrade earlier) and wasn’t replaced. That left NY-SERVICE04, NY-SERVICE05, NY-REDIS01 and NY-REDIS02. On the service boxes the process was pretty easy, though we did learn something interesting: if you put both of the drives from the RAID 10 OS array in an R610 into the new R630…it boots all the way into Windows 2012 without any issues. This threw us for a moment because we didn’t remember building it in the last 3 minutes. Rebuild is simple: lay down Windows 2012 R2 via our image + updates + DSC, then install the jobs they do. StackServer (from a sysadmin standpoint) is simply a windows service – and our TeamCity build handles the install and such, it’s literally just a parameter flag. These boxes also run a small IIS instance for internal services but that’s also a simple build out. The last task they do is host a DFS share, which we wanted to trim down and simplify the topology of, so we left them disabled as DFS targets and tackled that the following week – we had NY-SERVICE03 in rotation for the shares and could do such work entirely remotely. For redis we always have a slave chain happening, it looks like this: This means we can do an upgrade/failover/upgrade without interrupting service at all. After all those buildouts, here’s the super fancy new web tier installed:

To get an idea of the scale of hardware difference, the old web tier was Dell R610s with dual Intel E5640 processors and 48GB of RAM (upgraded over the years). The new web tier has dual Intel 2687W v3 processors and 64GB of DDR4 memory. We re-used the same dual Intel 320 300GB SSDs for the OS RAID 1. If you’re curious about specs on all this hardware – the next post we’ll do is a detailed writeup of our current infrastructure including exact specs.

Day 4 (Thursday, Jan 29th): I picked a fight with the cluster rack, D. Much of the day was spent giving the cluster rack a makeover now that we had most of the cables we needed in. When it was first racked, the pieces we needed hadn’t arrived by go time. It turns out we were still short a few cat and power cables as you’ll see in the photos, but we were able to get 98% of the way there.

It took a while to whip this rack into shape because we added cable arms where they were missing, replaced most of the cabling, and are fairly particular about the way we do things. For instance: how do you know things are plugged into the right port and where the other end of the cable goes? Labels. Lots and lots of labels. We label both ends of every cable and every server on both sides. It adds a bit of time now, but it saves both time and mistakes later.

Cable labels!Web servers without labelsWeb servers with labels!Web server rear labels

Here’s what the racks ended up looking like when we ran out of time this trip:

It’s not perfect since we ran out of several cables of the proper color and length. We have ordered those and George will be tidying the last few bits up.

I know what you’re thinking. We don’t think that’s enough server eye-candy either.

Here’s the full album of our move.

And here’s the #SnowOps twitter stream which has a bit more.

What Went Wrong

  • We’d be downright lying to say everything went smoothly. Hardware upgrades of this magnitude never do. Expect it. Plan for it. Allow time for it.
  • Remember when we upgraded to those new database servers in 2010 and the performance wasn’t what we expected? Yeah, that. There is a bug we’re currently helping Dell track down in their 1.0.4/1.1.4 BIOS for these systems that seems to not respect whatever performance setting you have. With Windows, a custom performance profile disabling C-States to stay at max performance works. In CentOS 7, it does not – but disabling the Intel PState driver does. We have even ordered and just racked a minimal R630 to test and debug issues like this as well as test our deployment from bare metal to constantly improve our build automation. Whatever is at fault with these settings not being respected, our goal is to get that vendor to release an update addressing the issue so that others don’t get the same nasty surprise.
  • We ran into an issue deploying our web tier with DSC getting locked up on a certain reboot thinking it needed a reboot to finish but coming up in the same state after a reboot in an endless cycle. We also hit issues with our deployment of the git client on those machines.
  • We learned that accidentally sticking a server with nothing but naked IIS into rotation is really bad. Sorry about that one.
  • We learned that if you move the drives from a RAID array from an R610 to an R630 and don’t catch the PXE boot prompt, the server will happily boot all the way into the OS.
  • We learned the good and the bad of the Dell FX2 IOA architecture and how they are self-contained switches.
  • We learned the CMC (management) ports on the FX2 chassis are effectively a switch. We knew they were suitable for daisy chaining purposes. However, we promptly forgot this, plugged them both in for redundancy and created a switching loop that reset Spanning Tree on our management network. Oops.
  • We learned the one guy on twitter who was OCD about the one upside down box was right. It was a pain to flip that web server over after opening it upside down and removing some critical box supports.
  • We didn’t mention this was a charge-only cable. Wow, that one riled twitter up. We appreciate the #infosec concern though!
  • We drastically underestimated how much twitter loves naked servers. It’s okay, we do too.
  • We learned that Dell MD1400 (13g and 12Gb/s) DAS (direct attached storage) arrays do not support hooking into their 12g servers like our R620 backup server. We’re working with them on resolving this issue.
  • We learned Dell hardware diagnostics don’t even check the power supply, even when the server has an orange light on the front complaining about it.
  • We learned that Blizzards are cold, the wind is colder, and sleep is optional.

The Payoff

Here’s what the average render time for question pages looks like, if you look really closely you can guess when the upgrade happened: Question page render times The decrease on question render times (from approx 30-35ms to 10-15ms) is only part of the fun. The next post in this series will detail many of the other drastic performance increases we’ve seen as the result of our upgrades. Stay tuned for a lot of real world payoffs we’ll share in the coming weeks.

Does all this sound like fun?

To us, it is fun. If you feel the same way, come do it with us. We are specifically looking for sysadmins preferably with data center experience to come help out in New York. We are currently hiring 2 positions:

If you’re curious at all, please ask us questions here, Twitter, or wherever you’re most comfortable. Really. We love Q&A.

«
»
  • drgraffix

    This is a great article! i’d like to know the budget you were working with…

    • Our budget is pretty … loosely defined. Basically our mandate is to be awesome. We are also trusted to make correct decisions.

      That said, we do have to plan out and work with the Finance side to make sure we aren’t wasting money. One of the few things we don’t like to talk about is financials. But it was more than $100,000 and less than $1,000,000

  • Sean Feeney

    We’ve been fighting with dell over the md1400 stuff for months. It’s really going to burn us. Would love to hear if you get them to solve it for you.

    • We are fighting the good fight there. We have an interim solution, but we are still talking with them to see what can be done to make it backwards compatible with 12 Gen server

  • Dmitriy A.

    I am curious. What do you do with retired servers and old hardware?

    • We give employees the option to grab a server if they would like. We will also shop them around to other departments to see if they need them. Anything left gets put into a R&D Lab type enviroment.

      • Christopher McCrum

        First off – this was very impressive and informative. Good job guys! I hope I’m not out of line here but I work with various non-profits and was wondering if you guys partner with charity organizations such as schools? Either way, keep up the good work!

        • We don’t at this time, but it is definitely on our radar for a way to make use of this hardware.

          Feel free to reach out to me via email (george AT SO.com) if you would like to discuss any options you have.

          • Christopher McCrum

            Hey George the email bounced back (probably whitelisting on your end). If you can shoot me an email at cmccrum at dawntreaderschool.com I’ll resend the original email. Thank you!

          • Hey Chris, did you try @stackoverflow.com? We call it “SO.com” for shorthand internally which may have no traslated well here.

          • Christopher McCrum

            Thanks nick, that’s totally what happened.

  • CS

    What’s it pay?

  • Jacob

    Did you guys just use consumer SATA SSDs rather than buying drives from Dell? Do they work with the dell raid controller? Any concerns about reliability? I’d like to go the cheap route here to if possible.

    • We use a blend of SSDs depending on what the purpose is. From the Samsung 840’s on the low end, to the Intel P3700 NVMe PCI SSDs on the high end. They are all orders of magnitude cheaper than what dell wants for an SSD. Or production loads go onto Intel drives which are more “enterprise-y” and places where the data isn’t as important (read 100% reproducible) they go on Samsungs.

  • mf

    Nice shirt. Go CGPGrey!

  • Hywel Mallett

    Happy to be “the one guy on twitter who was OCD about the one upside down box”. Even happier to have you guys say I was right!

  • anon

    I’m pretty sure it’s a strict policy in QTS to not take pictures while on the floor at the data center and your cage could do with a bit of clean up 😉

  • swguy

    What software you used to measure “question render times” ? google analytics? btw, good job with the upgrade and blog.

    • We capture this from the TR field in the syslog HAProxy sends – which is from the initial connection from HAProxy to the web server until the last byte of the response is received.

      This syslog traffic gets broadcasted to a few places: to a SQL server for a service to log, and a service called Realog that processes the aggregates real-time as well. These 2 are being combined into 1 service soon. Part of the piece being combined is Realog’s sending of aggregate metrics like this to Bosun as well as the live graphs it provides. The actual graph there is from Bosun itself, where we send all numerical data like this for monitoring and alerting.

      If you have more specific questions on any of that, send them our way!

  • ithedgehog

    It almost makes me miss the years I spent tending to a data centre… almost 😉

  • Joel Coehoorn

    One thing I noticed is that you’re setting yourself up for another huge equipment refresh in 4 years. I would have looked for a place to make one of those “exceptions” you talked about, so that I could start spreading my equipment load out year over year.

    • To be fair: only what we replaced this time. Most of our moves and upgrades are actually of this magnitude, we may vary the number of hands on site and the moves are obviously offline – but we actually like this level of load and plan accordingly. Working at night was not something we planned, the blizzard just worked out that way.

      Doing a huge refresh like this is actually ideal for a mostly-remote team. In our case (especially since we all have significant others and some have kids), we want to fly in – get a lot of work done, and get back home.

      I’m in no way saying this works for everyone…all (okay, most) of what we do works for us.

      • Joel Coehoorn

        There are some other things to be said for this, as well. For example, if you get yourself into a cycle of replacing just one of, say, web tier, database tier, caching tier, and switching/utility/load balancing each year, you are tying yourself into always having exactly those tiers. Doing bigger chunks at once gives you the opportunity to completely rethink the big-picture architecture if you need to. But it’s a lot of work in those big years, and it’s weird to get the finance guys willing to do it that way. Usually they want to even out costs over time, which could mean leasing (rather than owning) the equipment.

        • I think it’s safe to say we’re not a normal company when it comes to many things. We do what works for us – including on the financial side. We’re not bound by the same bureaucracy and massive policy weight most large companies have accrued over time.

          Also, this isn’t our own data center 😉 We could change things in tandem if we ever needed to, with or without traffic being served from that site.

          I don’t mean to dismiss your points – they are valid and even very important for some shops, I simply think they don’t apply to us for the most part. We do things very, very simple in a way that works well and works fast. I sincerely hope that never changes.

  • Rallias

    Awesome write up.

    One comment though. There’s no E5-5640. Your link’s text is wrong, and should say E5640. That bothered me.

    • Doh, you’re right – I didn’t use the right nomenclature there. Post is updated and should reflect when the cache clears!

  • Michael

    Nice work! May I ask what is the size of the team that worked on this?

    • There where 3 of us physically on site – Nick, Greg and Myself. The rest of the team supported us remotely.

      We did all the physical labor and then handed off to the remote team (Shane, Kyle, Tom, Geoff) for software config. Greg did a ton of work on the Web Tier spin up while at the DC.

  • Evgeniy Belousov

    а я помидор!

    • I have no idea what those crazy moon characters mean but I see an exclamation point and I’m glad you’re excited!

      Edit: according to google that says “I tomatoes !”, which really only brings more questions to the table.

      • Aerosalo

        It’s writtien in Russian and means ” And I am a tomato!”. I think this joke stemmed from some commercial.

  • WilliamN

    I definately would’ve gone infiband.

    • Enjoy! We likely have different needs in both data volume and physical requirements. Always: do what works for you. This works well for us.

  • Pat

    WOW fantastic article! Wish I had the budget for those FC630’s. My jaw is on the floor right now and my 10 U’s of md1200’s and r310’s know I will never look at them the same.

  • Rael Mussell

    Lots of cool stuff going on here. How did you arrive at your hardware purchasing conclusions? Did you consider going 100% virtual? Did you consider converged infrastructure? Are you booting local on your FC630’s or booting from SAN?

    I love this kind of stuff..

    • We simply buy the best fit – that’s on a case-by-case basis and George and I just sit down and figure it out.

      100% Virtual? Nope. We tune many, many things well beyond what VMs can do and need a lot more throughput to render pages as fast as we can. If your intent is to push a set of physical hard to the max virtualizing certainly won’t help performance in that case.

      Converged Infrastructure? Nope. We use many open source components and know of no vendor that really has anything remotely close to suiting our needs there. Plus we are somewhat invested in Dell at this point for several reasons.

      We PXE booted the FC630s to spin them up, but they now boot local. The have no local drives but do have the dual 16GB SD card pair for the hypervisor (ESX).

      Let me know if that leaves more questions!

  • Brad

    Dell Equipment, Brady Labeler, you guys did it right!

  • Florian Heigl

    The 840Pro bit made me go sick for a moment, then stop worrying (for restores) then cry (we learned that lesson). (The PM843 and newer ones are really cheap and don’t have that caveat)

    Love the Raid0 restore array. Periodically disband the array and give them a sata secure erase for performance consistency.

  • Michael DePaulo

    The Intel E5-2698v3 processors have 16 cores, not 18. Did you mean the E5-2699v3, which does have 18 cores?

    • You are indeed correct – unfortunately I have a Dell parts sheet with a 2698 and 18 cores on it (which is obviously wrong). I’ll check VMWare directly when time allows (might be Sunday) and check it out. My assumption would be the 18 core count is wrong and not the model but it could be the reverse.

      Thanks for the catch – I’ll follow-up and update the article with a correction as soon as I have the accurate specs.

  • jacek

    The organizers of cables for dell servers are worthless, not suitable. We installed it once and never again.

    • They work for us – though it’s up to the primary sysadmin(s) running that data center to decide. George prefers arms, so New Jersey has arms. Shane does not, so Denver will not. They’re not for organization, they’re for much faster or online maintenance – which is our main driver for getting them.

      If they don’t work for you, absolutely don’t get them – it’s absolutely a preference item and I wouldn’t push them on anyway. I’m very adamant about it being the person/people who will ACTUALLY be dealing with the servers making that decision, as well as many others.

  • Carl W.

    NEEEERRRRRDDDDDSSSSSSSS!!!!!!!!!

  • Brian

    Did you guys do any estimates of the costs to do this on AWS or Azure?

    I think the answer is “too much”, but I’m curious if it was tempting or not.

  • Joe

    This was a shitshow and you were beyond lucky that it didn’t result in any outages.

    • Thanks! We love you too!

    • m_a_r_t_i_n

      If by shitshow you mean an exceedingly well planned and executed upgrade of a highly complex system, then yeah, this was a total shitshow. Thanks for the writeup, guys! I enjoyed reading about the nitty gritty.

  • Njegos Railic

    This is a great article! Thank you guys ! 😉

  • Crypsis

    Hmm. What are the CloudFlare load balancers? Did they give you some custom kit or something?

  • bicofino

    Lots of fun reading this!

  • algorix

    Thanks for sharing. Great job!

  • Great! if you guys want a excellent SEO company, the, Posicionamiento Web Marbella is the choice, enter at our website http://www.posicionamiento-web-marbella.com/ and find out more

  • sodabeh
  • aroosha
  • sogand
  • sepanta
  • shirinazar
  • labina
  • Adam Swift

    @adam Nice and Informative post. It is necessary to upgrade any data center, whether it is live or not. Its very risky process so it requires more attention and more observation during this process. Also it requires more power and more people to do this.

  • Mandeep Singh

    Well written, well planned. To be very fair lots of fun reading this article. It’s too deep. I can guess how much efforts you guys had bring for this write-up. Every step is on a case-by-case basis it’s really hard to figure it out. We use MCE server appliance for our Scalable Storage Systems. MCE services a wide variety of markets ranging from: Storage, Security, Networking, Communication, Cloud etc.

    One another thing I would like to say regarding this article that sound seems you guys have did excellent with Documentation, Remote monitoring and also with Co-coordinating team. Moving kit to the data Centre is a combination of diligence and care.

  • Herman Wilson

    I like the way you represent the functionality and updation of the data center. Great efforts indeed!!!

    hardware upgrade

  • Very impressive write-up, photos and equipment. I will be sharing it with my Data Center Students.at the Illinois Institute of Technology and also linking this page it to my Data Center Manager page at http://billslater.com/datacentermanager

    By the way, what DCIM software are you using?

    Visit this link for some presentations about a Data Center Build and Migration I managed in 2008-2009, immediately after I left Microsoft. https://onedrive.live.com/?cid=bf9ea3001ee4c8dc&id=BF9EA3001EE4C8DC%215773

  • Alexandre

    Amazing feedback ! Thank you so much ! Any change to have a follow up/technical detail after 5 months in production ?

  • Laehyoung Kim

    Hello, Guys. It’s a great article!! So If you don’t mind, I’d like to translate to Korean on my blog. Can I do this?

  • moviehdmax

    Nice writeup. Watch more movie online at http://moviehdmax.com

  • Here’s a question, why R630’s and nexus switching and not blades M630 with MXL’s ?

  • Aaron

    Nick, At the end of the details about day 3 you mentioned there would be a followup post on the current infrastructure. Any ETA on when that would be?

  • Nick

    Watch movies and series online: https://cinemate.tv/

  • Movie4k

    Watch hollywood movies online free http://www.movie4k.club/

  • nazly
  • Eric

    Thanks guys, after spending years using Virtual Data Rooms like https://www.sharefile.com/virtual-data-room, this helped me to upgrade the physical machines I have to use too.

  • Jason

    how much is a data center worth if it was established in 2010

    • nobody

      1 trillion dogecoins.

  • RacksReady

    Thank you, for explaining all this to people. It is a great help! A big thank you for this article

  • rocky

    Watch Movies online free movie71

  • Watch Movies Online For Free –>>> http://vodlocker.be/

  • nobody

    Although this is cool, I HATE HATE HATE, DESPISE WITH A PASSION all the stack overflow sites, ESPECIALLY serverfault which I REALLY REALLY DESPISE.

    I hate your websites so much and I hate the people who made a system that is so fucking awful to be the absolute worst user friendliness. So fuck your admins who designed this steaming pile of shit website called serverfault.